z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Three Methods to Determine Profiles of Reflectivity from Volumetric Radar Data to Correct Precipitation Estimates
Author(s) -
Bertrand Vignal,
G. Galli,
J. Joss,
Urs Germann
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of applied meteorology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1520-0450
pISSN - 0894-8763
DOI - 10.1175/1520-0450-39.10.1715
Subject(s) - orography , radar , precipitation , weather radar , quantitative precipitation forecast , meteorology , environmental science , remote sensing , quantitative precipitation estimation , geology , computer science , geography , telecommunications
The vertical variability of radar reflectivity reduces the reliability of precipitation estimation by radar, especially in complex orography. This important source of error can, at least partially, be corrected for, if the vertical profile of radar reflectivity (VPR) is known. This work addresses three ways to determine VPR from volumetric radar data for correcting precipitation estimates. The first way uses a climatological profile. The second method, operational in Switzerland, takes the actual weather conditions into account: a mean profile is estimated directly from volumetric radar data collected close to the radar. The third way determines the identified profile, taking the variability of the VPRs in space into account. This approach yields local estimates of the profile (on areas of about 20 km × 20 km) based on an inverse method. Two cases, a convective event and a stratiform event, are used to illustrate the three ways for determining the VPR, and the resulting improvement, verified with rain gauges. An enlarged dataset of nine cases shows that a correction based on a climatological profile already improves the accuracy of rain estimates by radar significantly: the fractional standard error (FSE) is reduced from the noncorrected 44% to 31%. By correcting with a single, mean profile (averaged over 1 h using real-time data), the FSE is further reduced from 31% to 25%. Last, the use of 70 locally identified profiles leads to best results (FSE = 23%). A higher improvement (lower FSE) is obtained for the stratiform rain event than for the convective case.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here