
How to analyze contextuality of metatextual language units? Notes on the relation: TRS – particle semantics
Author(s) -
Anna Kisiel
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
cognitive studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2392-2397
pISSN - 2080-7147
DOI - 10.11649/cs.2011.018
Subject(s) - kochen–specker theorem , meaning (existential) , relation (database) , lexicography , linguistics , semantics (computer science) , particle (ecology) , computer science , physics , epistemology , programming language , philosophy , quantum mechanics , database , quantum , oceanography , geology
How to analyze contextuality of metatextual language units? Notes on the relation: TRS – particle semanticsThe presented article is devoted to further (after Kisiel 2010) discussion about contextuality of metatextual language units, especially particles. Having selected contextual particles as an example, the author shows how specific structuralisation of TRS is strictly connected with particle meaning. The observation leads to the conclusion that examination of TRS cannot be avoided when analysing particles. Untangling particles meaning has to be based on describing the TRS they work on. Such a procedure has been only recently applied to Polish lexicography.