Open AccessConventional and Complementary Healthcare Utilization Among US Adults With Cardiovascular Disease or Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Nationally Representative Survey
Author(s) -
Kohl Wiebke Kathrin,
Dobos Gustav,
Cramer Holger
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.119.014759
Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , health care , odds ratio , disease , family medicine , national health interview survey , environmental health , cross sectional study , medical expenditure panel survey , population , health insurance , pathology , economics , economic growth
Background Cardiovascular diseases ( CVDs ) and their risk factors need guideline‐oriented treatment to provide the best benefit for patients. These guidelines include recommendations for regular checkups, realized by general medical practitioners. In addition, individuals with CVD or CVD risk factors tend to use complementary methods for their condition. There is limited information on the association between complementary healthcare utilization and the adherence to recommended conventional health care. Methods and Results In this cross‐sectional analysis of the nationally representative 2017 National Health Interview Survey (n=26 742; response rate 80.7%) we examined the prevalence of conventional and complementary healthcare utilization within the past 12 months in individuals with CVD and/or CVD risk factors and the interactions between the two categories of health care. Of all participants, 38.1% reported risk factors for CVD and 11.4% a CVD diagnosis (groups show an overlap). Overall prevalence of visits to conventional and complementary medicine providers and the use of mind–body medicine was high within the population analyzed. Individuals with CVD and/or CVD risk factors using complementary health care were as likely or more likely to consult general practitioners ( CVD : adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.17; 95% CI, 0.93–1.47; CVD risk: aOR, 1.21; 95% CI , 1.05–1.39) and medical specialists ( CVD : aOR, 1.38; 95% CI , 1.17–1.64; CVD risk: aOR, 1.42; 95% CI , 1.28–1.58) than those not using complementary health care. Those using complementary health care were as likely to adhere to medical checkup as those not using complementary health care. Conclusions Complementary healthcare utilization use was not associated with a reduced adherence to conventional health care and recommended checkups. The potential positive association of complementary and conventional healthcare utilization needs to be confirmed in further studies.