Open AccessLow‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers
Author(s) -
Strand Sarah,
Lutter William,
Strasburger Janette F.,
Shah Vishal,
Baffa Oswaldo,
Wakai Ronald T.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.119.013436
Subject(s) - magnetocardiography , shielded cable , medicine , squid , magnetometer , gradiometer , electrical engineering , computer science , telecommunications , physics , magnetic field , cardiology , engineering , ecology , quantum mechanics , biology
Background Fetal magnetocardiography ( fMCG ) is a highly effective technique for evaluation of fetuses with life‐threatening arrhythmia, but its dissemination has been constrained by the high cost and complexity of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) instrumentation. Optically pumped magnetometers ( OPM s) are a promising new technology that can replace SQUID s for many applications. This study compares the performance of an fMCG system, utilizing OPM s operating in a person‐sized magnetic shield, to that of a conventional fMCG system, utilizing SQUID magnetometers operating in a magnetically shielded room. Methods and Results fMCG recordings were made in 24 subjects using the SQUID system with the mother lying supine in a magnetically shielded room and the OPM system with the mother lying prone in a person‐sized, cylindrical shield. Signal‐to‐noise ratios of the OPM and SQUID recordings were not statistically different and were adequate for diagnostic purposes with both technologies. Although the environmental noise was higher using the small open‐ended shield, this was offset by the higher signal amplitude achieved with prone positioning, which reduced the distance between the fetus and sensors and improved patient comfort. In several subjects, fMCG provided a differential diagnosis that was more precise and/or definitive than was possible with echocardiography alone. Conclusions The OPM ‐based system was portable, improved patient comfort, and performed as well as the SQUID ‐based system at a small fraction of the cost. Electrophysiological assessment of fetal rhythm is now practical and will have a major impact on management of fetuses with long QT syndrome and other life‐threatening arrhythmias.