Open AccessLocal Production of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor‐1 in the Coronary Circulation Is Associated With Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans
Author(s) -
Corban Michel T.,
Prasad Abhiram,
Nesbitt Lisa,
Loeffler Darrell,
Herrmann Joerg,
Lerman Lilach O.,
Lerman Amir
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.118.009881
Subject(s) - medicine , plasminogen activator , cardiology , urokinase , coronary circulation , plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 , activator (genetics) , tissue plasminogen activator , receptor , blood flow
Background Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (su PAR ) is a proinflammatory biomarker associated with immune activation and fibrinolysis inhibition. Plasminogen activator inhibitor ( PAI ‐1) is associated with excessive fibrin accumulation, thrombus formation, and atherosclerosis. The relationship between cross‐coronary su PAR and PAI ‐1 production and endothelial dysfunction remains unknown. Methods and Results Seventy‐nine patients (age 53±10 years, 75% women) with angina and normal coronary arteries or mild coronary artery disease (<40% stenosis) on angiogram underwent acetylcholine assessment of epicardial endothelial dysfunction (mid–left anterior descending coronary artery diameter decrease >20% after acetylcholine) and mircovascular endothelial dysfunction (coronary blood flow change <50% after acetylcholine). Simultaneous left main and coronary sinus su PAR and PAI ‐1 levels were measured in each patient before acetylcholine administration, and cross‐coronary su PAR and PAI ‐1 production rates were calculated. Patients’ characteristics, except for age (51±10 versus 57±9, P =0.02), and resting coronary hemodynamics were not significantly different between patients with (26%) versus without (74%) epicardial endothelial dysfunction. Patients’ characteristics and resting coronary hemodynamics were not significantly different between those with (62%) and those without (38%) mircovascular endothelial dysfunction. Patients with mircovascular endothelial dysfunction demonstrated local coronary su PAR production versus su PAR extraction in patients with normal microvascular function (median 25.8 [interquartile range 121.6, −23.7] versus −12.7 [52.0, −74.8] ng/min, P =0.03). Patients with epicardial endothelial dysfunction had higher median coronary PAI ‐1 production rates compared with those with normal epicardial endothelial function (1224.7 [12 940.7, −1915.4] versus −187.4 [4444.7, −4535.8] ng/min, P =0.03). Conclusions su PAR is released in coronary circulation of patients with mircovascular endothelial dysfunction and extracted in those with normal microvascular function. Cross‐coronary PAI ‐1 release is higher in humans with epicardial endothelial dysfunction.