Open AccessImpact of Exercise Restriction on Arrhythmic Risk Among Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Author(s) -
Wang Weijia,
Orgeron Gabriela,
Tichnell Crystal,
Murray Brittney,
Crosson Jane,
Monfredi Oliver,
CadrinTourigny Julia,
Tandri Harikrishna,
Calkins Hugh,
James Cynthia A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.118.008843
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , hazard ratio , interquartile range , cardiomyopathy , confidence interval , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , sudden cardiac death , heart failure
Background Prior studies have shown a close link between exercise and development of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. How much exercise restriction reduces ventricular arrhythmia (VA), how genotype modifies its benefit, and whether it reduces risk sufficiently to defer implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator ( ICD ) placement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy are unknown. Methods and Results We interviewed 129 arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients (age: 34.0±14.8 years; male: 60%) with ICD s (36% primary prevention) about exercise participation. Exercise change was defined as annual exercise duration and dose in the 3 years before clinical presentation minus that after presentation. The primary outcome was appropriate ICD therapy for VA. During the 5.1 years (interquartile range: 2.7–10.8 years) after presentation, 74% (95/129) patients reduced exercise dose and 85 (66%) patients experienced the primary outcome. In multivariate analyses, top tertile reduction in exercise duration and dose were both associated with less VA (duration: hazard ratio: 0.23 [95% confidence interval, 0.07–0.81]; dose: hazard ratio: 0.14 [95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.44]). Greater reduction in exercise dose conferred greater reduction in VA ( P =0.01 for trend). Patients without desmosomal mutations and those with primary‐prevention ICD s benefited more from exercise reduction ( P =0.16 and P =0.06 for interaction); however, 58% (18/31) of athletes who reduced exercise dose by >80% still experienced VA . Conclusions Exercise restriction should be recommended to all arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients with ICD s. Patients who are “gene‐elusive” and those with primary‐prevention devices may particularly benefit. Exercise reduction is unlikely to reduce arrhythmia sufficiently in high‐risk patients to alter decision‐making regarding ICD implantation.