
Acute Kidney Injury in Diabetic Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Role of Acute and Chronic Glycemia
Author(s) -
Marenzi Giancarlo,
Cosentino Nicola,
Milazzo Valentina,
De Metrio Monica,
Rubino Mara,
Campodonico Jeness,
Moltrasio Marco,
Marana Ivana,
Grazi Marco,
Lauri Gianfranco,
Bonomi Alice,
Barbieri Simone,
Assanelli Emilio,
Dalla Cia Alessia,
Manfrini Roberto,
Ceriani Roberto,
Bartorelli Antonio
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.117.008122
Subject(s) - medicine , myocardial infarction , acute kidney injury , diabetes mellitus , cardiology , kidney disease , acute injury , intensive care medicine , surgery , endocrinology
Background In acute myocardial infarction, acute hyperglycemia is a predictor of acute kidney injury ( AKI ), particularly in patients without diabetes mellitus. This emphasizes the importance of an acute glycemic rise rather than glycemia level at admission. We investigated whether, in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, the combined evaluation of acute and chronic glycemic levels may have better prognostic value for AKI than admission glycemia. Methods and Results At admission, we prospectively measured glycemia and estimated average chronic glucose levels (mg/dL) using glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ), according to the following formula: 28.7×HbA 1c (%)−46.7. We evaluated the association with AKI of the acute/chronic glycemic ratio and of the difference between acute and chronic glycemia (Δ A−C ). We enrolled 474 diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. Of them, 77 (16%) experienced AKI . The incidence of AKI increased in parallel with the acute/chronic glycemic ratio (12%, 14%, 22%; P =0.02 for trend) and Δ A−C (13%, 13%, 23%; P =0.01) but not with admission glycemic tertiles ( P =0.22). At receiver operating characteristic analysis, the acute/chronic glycemic ratio (area under the curve: 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.69]; P =0.001) and Δ A−C (area under the curve: 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.54–0.69]; P =0.002) accurately predicted AKI , without difference in the area under the curve between them ( P =0.53). At reclassification analysis, the addition of the acute/chronic glycemic ratio and Δ A−C to acute glycemia allowed proper AKI risk prediction in 16% of patients. Conclusions In diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, AKI is better predicted by the combined evaluation of acute and chronic glycemic values than by assessment of admission glycemia alone.