z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Paradox of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Therapy: Saving Lives But Revealing an Increased Mortality Risk
Author(s) -
Aleong Ryan G.,
Sauer William H.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.117.007087
Subject(s) - medicine , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , primary prevention , sudden cardiac death , secondary prevention , ventricular fibrillation , cardiac resynchronization therapy , cardiology , heart failure , ejection fraction , disease
At one time, implantation of an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) was reserved for those patients who survived sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular arrhythmia and had a secondary‐prevention‐only indication. However, along with improvements in device technology and the implant

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here