z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Lipoprotein(a) Interactions With Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome ( ACS )
Author(s) -
Afshar Mehdi,
Pilote Louise,
Dufresne Line,
Engert James C.,
Thanassoulis George
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.115.003012
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , interquartile range , acute coronary syndrome , risk factor , lipoprotein(a) , prospective cohort study , population , lipoprotein , cholesterol , myocardial infarction , environmental health
Background Current recommendations for lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) focus on the control of other risk factors, including lowering low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL ‐C), with little evidence to support this approach. Identifying interactions between Lp(a) and other risk factors could identify individuals at increased risk for Lp(a)‐mediated disease. Methods and Results We used a case‐only study design and included 939 participants (median age=49 years, interquartile range 46–53, women=33.1%) from the GENdE r and Sex determInantS of cardiovascular disease: from bench to beyond‐Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome ( GENESIS ‐ PRAXY ) study, a multicenter prospective cohort study of premature acute coronary syndrome. There was a higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) levels (>50 mg/dL; 80th percentile) in PRAXY participants as compared to the general population (31% versus 20%; P <0.001). Lp(a) was strongly associated with LDL ‐C (adjusted β 0.17; P <0.001). Individuals with high Lp(a) were more likely to have LDL ‐C >2.5 mmol/L, indicating a synergistic interaction (adjusted odds ratio 1.51; 95% CI 1.08–2.09; P =0.015). The interaction with high Lp(a) was stronger at increasing LDL ‐C levels ( LDL ‐C >3.5, adjusted odds ratio 1.87; LDL ‐C >4.5, adjusted odds ratio 2.72). In a polytomous logistic model comparing mutually exclusive LDL ‐C categories, the interaction with high Lp(a) became attenuated at LDL ‐C ≤3.5 mmol/L (odds ratio 1.16; 95% CI 0.80–1.68, P =0.447). Other risk factors were not associated with high Lp(a). Conclusions In young acute coronary syndrome patients, high Lp(a) is more prevalent than in the general population and is strongly associated with high LDL ‐C, suggesting that Lp(a) confers greater risk for acute coronary syndrome when LDL ‐C is elevated. Individuals with high Lp(a) and LDL ‐C >3.5 mmol/L may warrant aggressive LDL ‐C lowering.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here