z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Sex Differences in Symptoms Reported on the 13‐Item Acute Coronary Syndrome Checklist
Author(s) -
DeVon Holli A.,
Rosenfeld Anne,
Steffen Alana D.,
Daya Mohamud
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.113.000586
Subject(s) - medicine , acute coronary syndrome , chest pain , emergency department , logistic regression , odds ratio , checklist , predictive value of tests , myocardial infarction , psychology , psychiatry , cognitive psychology
Background Clinical symptoms are part of the risk stratification approaches used in the emergency department ( ED ) to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes ( ACS ). The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 13 symptoms for a discharge diagnosis of ACS in women and men. Methods and Results The sample included 736 patients admitted to 4 ED s with symptoms suggestive of ACS . Symptoms were assessed with the 13‐item validated ACS Symptom Checklist. Mixed‐effects logistic regression models were used to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of each symptom for a diagnosis of ACS , adjusting for age, obesity, diabetes, and functional status. Patients were predominantly male (63%) and Caucasian (70.5%), with a mean age of 59.7±14.2 years. Chest pressure, chest discomfort, and chest pain demonstrated the highest sensitivity for ACS in both women (66%, 66%, and 67%) and men (63%, 69%, and 72%). Six symptoms were specific for a non‐ ACS diagnosis in both women and men. The predictive value of shoulder (odds ratio [ OR] =2.53; 95% CI =1.29 to 4.96) and arm pain ( OR 2.15; 95% CI =1.10 to 4.20) in women was nearly twice that of men ( OR =1.11; 95% CI =0.67 to 1.85 and OR =1.21; 95% CI =0.74 to 1.99). Shortness of breath ( OR =0.49; 95% CI =0.30 to 0.79) predicted a non‐ ACS diagnosis in men. Conclusions There were more similarities than differences in symptom predictors of ACS for women and men.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here