z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Herbatian formalism in Bohemia
Author(s) -
Peter Steiner
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
rus
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2317-4765
DOI - 10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2021.189607
Subject(s) - formalism (music) , hegelianism , beauty , indigenous , content (measure theory) , aesthetics , philosophy , epistemology , aesthetic experience , sociology , literature , art history , history , art , mathematics , musical , ecology , mathematical analysis , biology
From a bird’s eye view, the history of 19th century aesthetics can be cast in terms of strife between two mutually opposed philosophical camps. On the one hand, the champions of a content-oriented understanding of beauty as the sensory manifestation of the idea (the followers of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel) and, on the other hand, the formalists (inspired by Johann Friedrich Herbart) who conceived of beauty as a purely relational category devoid of any content. My paper focuses on the robust development of the formal school at Prague University after 1850 exemplified by the theories of Robert Zimmermann (1824-1898), Josef Durdík (1837-1902), and Otakar Hostinský (1847-1910). It concludes with posing the question whether the structuralist aesthetics advanced in mid-1930s by the Prague Linguistic Circle was not, in fact, an echo of the indigenous Herbartian formalism.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here