z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of the different controlling techniques for buck converter in LED application
Author(s) -
Shwetha Dv,
Lakshman Rao S. Paragond
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of power electronics and drive systems (ijpeds)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.322
H-Index - 21
ISSN - 2088-8694
DOI - 10.11591/ijpeds.v10.i1.pp256-264
Subject(s) - overshoot (microwave communication) , bode plot , control theory (sociology) , settling time , pid controller , buck converter , controller (irrigation) , transient (computer programming) , transient response , signal (programming language) , computer science , steady state (chemistry) , step response , stability (learning theory) , voltage , transfer function , control (management) , control engineering , engineering , temperature control , telecommunications , electrical engineering , agronomy , chemistry , artificial intelligence , machine learning , biology , programming language , operating system
This paper recounts the design and construction of various controlling techniques for buck converter. If the designed controller for any converter is not proper which leads to high overshoot and steady state error, and its dynamic response varies with changes in load, especially at high load current conditions. The lead-lag controller for the converter  is desgined using classical control theory ,Bode Plot technique is used to examine the stability of the system.By using deravetive part of the PID controller on output signal instead of voltage error signal,this combination of control technique reduces the overshoot and settling time,and how the transient response will be affected if deravetive controller is in the forward path.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here