
Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study
Author(s) -
Majida Laaziri,
Khaoula Benmoussa,
Samira Khoulji,
Kerkeb Mohamed Larbi,
Abir El Yamami
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of electrical and computer engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.277
H-Index - 22
ISSN - 2088-8708
DOI - 10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp713-722
Subject(s) - front and back ends , computer science , context (archaeology) , foundation (evidence) , world wide web , end user , front (military) , web page , engineering , operating system , mechanical engineering , history , paleontology , archaeology , biology
Most modern web applications use some kind of front-end frameworks for designing and creating content in a faster and more efficient way, which saves valuable time when creating responsive web sites. There are many front-end frameworks that vary enormously in terms of features and benefits, which could make the choice of front-end framework for the developer tricky. In this context, this paper focuses on an effective analysis of two of today's most popular front-end frameworks, Boostrap and Foundation, The results show that our analysis can be beneficial for developers to select the appropriate front end framework to customize their web applications.