z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study
Author(s) -
Majida Laaziri,
Khaoula Benmoussa,
Samira Khoulji,
Kerkeb Mohamed Larbi,
Abir El Yamami
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of electrical and computer engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.277
H-Index - 22
ISSN - 2088-8708
DOI - 10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp713-722
Subject(s) - front and back ends , computer science , context (archaeology) , foundation (evidence) , world wide web , end user , front (military) , web page , engineering , operating system , mechanical engineering , history , paleontology , archaeology , biology
Most modern web applications use some kind of front-end frameworks for designing and creating content in a faster and more efficient way, which saves valuable time when creating responsive web sites. There are many front-end frameworks that vary enormously in terms of features and benefits, which could make the choice of front-end framework for the developer tricky. In this context, this paper focuses on an effective analysis of two of today's most popular front-end frameworks, Boostrap and Foundation, The results show that our analysis can be beneficial for developers to select the appropriate front end framework to customize their web applications.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here