z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Verification and comparison of MIT-BIH arrhythmia database based on number of beats
Author(s) -
Akram Jaddoa Khalaf,
Samir Jasim Mohammed
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of power electronics and drive systems/international journal of electrical and computer engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2722-2578
pISSN - 2722-256X
DOI - 10.11591/ijece.v11i6.pp4950-4961
Subject(s) - toolbox , computer science , beat (acoustics) , qrs complex , database , annotation , data mining , artificial intelligence , medicine , physics , acoustics , cardiology , programming language
The ECG signal processing methods are tested and evaluated based on many databases. The most ECG database used for many researchers is the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The QRS-detection algorithms are essential for ECG analyses to detect the beats for the ECG signal. There is no standard number of beats for this database that are used from numerous researches. Different beat numbers are calculated for the researchers depending on the difference in understanding the annotation file. In this paper, the beat numbers for existing methods are studied and compared to find the correct beat number that should be used. We propose a simple function to standardize the beats number for any ECG PhysioNet database to improve the waveform database toolbox (WFDB) for the MATLAB program. This function is based on the annotation's description from the databases and can be added to the Toolbox. The function is removed the non-beats annotation without any errors. The results show a high percentage of 71% from the reviewed methods used an incorrect number of beats for this database.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here