Open AccessDual-Energy Computed Tomography Compared to Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy to Assess Pulmonary Perfusion in Patients Screened for Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction
Author(s) -
Hester A. Gietema,
Kim H M Walraven,
Rein Posthuma,
Cristina Mitea,
DirkJan Slebos,
Lowie E.G.W. Vanfleteren
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
respiration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.264
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1423-0356
pISSN - 0025-7931
DOI - 10.1159/000517598
Subject(s) - perfusion , medicine , scintigraphy , nuclear medicine , radiology , lung , perfusion scanning , lung volumes , blood volume , dual energy , single photon emission computed tomography , bone mineral , osteoporosis
Background: Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) using one-way endobronchial valves is a technique to reduce hyperinflation in patients with severe emphysema by inducing collapse of a severely destroyed pulmonary lobe. Patient selection is mainly based on evaluation of emphysema severity on high-resolution computed tomography and evaluation of lung perfusion with perfusion scintigraphy. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced CT scans may be useful for perfusion assessment in emphysema but has not been compared against perfusion scintigraphy. Aims: The aim of the study was to compare perfusion distribution assessed with dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography and perfusion scintigraphy. Material and Methods: Forty consecutive patients with severe emphysema, who were screened for ELVR, were included. Perfusion was assessed with 99mTc perfusion scintigraphy and using the iodine map calculated from the dual-energy contrast-enhanced CT scans. Perfusion distribution was calculated as usually for the upper, middle, and lower thirds of both lungs with the planar technique and the iodine overlay. Results: Perfusion distribution between the right and left lung showed good correlation ( r = 0.8). The limits of agreement of the mean absolute difference in percentage perfusion per region of interest were 0.75–5.6%. The upper lobes showed more severe perfusion reduction than the lower lobes. Mean difference in measured pulmonary perfusion ranged from −2.8% to 2.3%. Lower limit of agreement ranged from −8.9% to 4.6% and upper limit was 3.3–10.0%. Conclusion: Quantification of perfusion distribution using planar 99mTc perfusion scintigraphy and iodine overlays calculated from dual-energy contrast-enhanced CTs correlates well with acceptable variability.