Open AccessSolid Papillary Carcinoma and Encapsulated Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast: Clinical-Pathologic Features and Basement Membrane Studies of 50 Cases
Author(s) -
Sarah Morgan,
David W. Dodington,
Jessie M. Wu,
Gulisa Turashvili
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pathobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1423-0291
pISSN - 1015-2008
DOI - 10.1159/000517189
Subject(s) - myoepithelial cell , medicine , pathology , carcinoma , micrometastasis , ductal carcinoma , basement membrane , immunohistochemistry , breast cancer , cancer
Solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) of the breast are usually considered in situ lesions due to favorable prognosis, despite the variable presence of myoepithelial cells. We aimed to describe clinical-pathologic features including basement membrane (BM) studies in these tumors. Methods: Patients diagnosed with SPC and EPC in 2000–2019 were retrospectively identified. Microscopic slides and clinical history were reviewed. Immunohistochemical stains for BM and myoepithelial markers were performed. Results: Of 23 SPCs and 27 EPCs, there were 5/23 (21.7%) pure SPCs and 9/27 (33.3%) pure EPCs, while 4/23 (17.4%) and 12/27 (44.5%) were associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 6/23 (26.1%) and 6/27 (22.2%) with invasive carcinoma, respectively; 8/23 (34.8%) SPCs were considered invasive. The median tumor size was 1.7 cm (range 0.1–16). All tumors were positive for hormone receptors and negative for HER2. Myoepithelial cells were absent in 20 tumors (40%) and focally present in 30 (60%). Collagen IV and laminin were negative in most invasive lesions, but they were expressed in 21/21 (100%) and 18/21 (85.7%) of EPCs without invasion, and 16/17 (94.1%) and 10/17 (58.8%) SPCs, including invasive SPCs, respectively. Lymph node involvement was identified in 3/26 (11.5%) patients, including micrometastasis in 1 EPC associated with DCIS, macrometastasis in 1 EPC associated with invasive carcinoma, and isolated tumor cells in 1 invasive SPC. Of 31 patients with outcome data (median follow-up 35 months, range 1–85), 2 (6.5%; 1 SPC, 1 EPC) developed local recurrence, both associated with invasive carcinoma. No distant recurrences or deaths were observed. Conclusions: Our study confirms favorable prognosis of SPCs and EPCs, with 2 local recurrences occurring in the presence of invasion. SPCs are more commonly associated with invasive carcinoma or considered invasive compared to EPCs (60.9 vs. 22.2%). The presence of BM material and lack of lymph node involvement in most cases indicates that the majority of these tumors may represent in situ lesions; however, some may behave as low-grade invasive malignancy with metastatic potential even in the absence of conventional invasion.