
Residual Hearing Affects Contralateral Routing of Signals in Cochlear Implant Users
Author(s) -
H. Christiaan Stronks,
Jeroen J. Briaire,
Johan H. M. Frijns
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
audiology and neuro-otology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1421-9700
pISSN - 1420-3030
DOI - 10.1159/000515210
Subject(s) - audiology , cochlear implant , residual , active listening , noise (video) , hearing loss , medicine , psychology , computer science , communication , artificial intelligence , algorithm , image (mathematics)
Contralateral routing of signals (CROS) can be used to eliminate the head shadow effect. In unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, CROS can be achieved with placement of a microphone on the contralateral ear, with the signal streamed to the CI ear. CROS was originally developed for unilateral CI users without any residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear. However, the criteria for implantation are becoming progressively looser, and the nonimplanted ear can have substantial residual hearing. In this study, we assessed how residual hearing in the contralateral ear influences CROS effectiveness in unilateral CI users. Methods: In a group of unilateral CI users ( N = 17) with varying amounts of residual hearing, we deployed free-field speech tests to determine the effects of CROS on the speech reception threshold (SRT) in amplitude-modulated noise. We compared 2 spatial configurations: (1) speech presented to the CROS ear and noise to the CI ear (S CROS N CI ) and (2) the reverse (S CI N CROS ). Results: Compared with the use of CI only, CROS improved the SRT by 6.4 dB on average in the S CROS N CI configuration. In the S CI N CROS configuration, however, CROS deteriorated the SRT by 8.4 dB. The benefit and disadvantage of CROS both decreased significantly with the amount of residual hearing. Conclusion: CROS users need careful instructions about the potential disadvantage when listening in conditions where the CROS ear mainly receives noise, especially if they have residual hearing in the contralateral ear. The CROS device should be turned off when it is on the noise side (S CI N CROS ). CI users with residual hearing in the CROS ear also should understand that contralateral amplification (i.e., a bimodal hearing solution) will yield better results than a CROS device. Unilateral CI users with no functional contralateral hearing should be considered the primary target population for a CROS device.