z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials
Author(s) -
Robert L. Coleman,
J. Thaddeus Beck,
Joaquina Baranda,
Ira Jacobs,
Karen E. Smoyer,
Lauren J. Lee,
Zemfira Askerova,
Justin M. McGinnis,
Apar Kishor Ganti
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.987
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1423-0232
pISSN - 0030-2414
DOI - 10.1159/000514874
Subject(s) - clinical trial , medicine , clinical oncology , oncology , cancer
Objective: To investigate patient-reported outcome (PRO) usage in phase I oncology clinical trials, including types of PRO measures and changes over time. Methods: We analyzed ClinicalTrials.gov records of phase I oncology clinical trials completed by December 2019. Results: Of all eligible trials, 2.3% (129/5,515) reported ≥1 PRO, totaling 181 instances of PRO usage. PRO usage increased over time, from 0.6% (trials initiated before 2000) to 3.4% (trials starting between 2015 and 2019). The most common PRO measures were unspecified (29%), tumor-specific (24%), and generic cancer (19%). Conclusion: Although uncommon in phase I oncology clinical trials, PRO usage is increasing over time. PRO measures were often unspecified on ClinicalTrials.gov, suggesting that more precise reporting and standardization are needed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here