z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Using an Automated Diagnostic System Based on Deep Learning: Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment
Author(s) -
Sílvia Rêgo,
Marco Dutra-Medeiros,
Filipe Soares,
Matilde MonteiroSoares
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.639
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1423-0267
pISSN - 0030-3755
DOI - 10.1159/000512638
Subject(s) - medicine , fundus (uterus) , diabetic retinopathy , predictive value , diagnostic accuracy , convolutional neural network , likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing , optometry , test (biology) , fundus photography , diagnostic test , positive predicative value , retinopathy , artificial intelligence , ophthalmology , pediatrics , visual acuity , computer science , diabetes mellitus , fluorescein angiography , paleontology , biology , endocrinology
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a diagnostic system software for the automated screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on digital colour fundus photographs, the 2019 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model with Inception-V3. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 295 fundus images were analysed by the CNN model and compared to a panel of ophthalmologists. Images were obtained from a dataset acquired within a screening programme. Diagnostic accuracy measures and respective 95% CI were calculated. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the CNN model in diagnosing referable DR was 81% (95% CI 66–90%) and 97% (95% CI 95–99%), respectively. Positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI 72–94%) and negative predictive value 96% (95% CI 93–98%). The positive likelihood ratio was 33 (95% CI 15–75) and the negative was 0.20 (95% CI 0.11–0.35). Its clinical impact is demonstrated by the change observed in the pre-test probability of referable DR (assuming a prevalence of 16%) to a post-test probability for a positive test result of 86% and for a negative test result of 4%. Conclusion: A CNN model negative test result safely excludes DR, and its use may significantly reduce the burden of ophthalmologists at reading centres.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here