z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Leg Volume in Patients with Lipoedema following Bariatric Surgery
Author(s) -
Jodok Fink,
Lisa Schreiner,
Goran Marjanović,
Gabriele Erbacher,
Gabriel Seifert,
M Foeldi,
Tobias Bertsch
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
visceral medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.598
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2297-475X
pISSN - 2297-4725
DOI - 10.1159/000511044
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , weight loss , lymphedema , thigh , edema , obesity , cancer , breast cancer
Lipoedema is characterized as subcutaneous lipohypertrophy in association with soft-tissue pain affecting female patients. Recently, the disease has undergone a paradigm shift departing from historic reiterations of defining lipoedema in terms of classic edema paired with the notion of weight loss-resistant leg volume towards an evidence-based, patient-centered approach. Although lipoedema is strongly associated with obesity, the effect of bariatric surgery on thigh volume and weight loss has not been explored. Material and Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, thigh volume and weight loss of 31 patients with lipoedema were analyzed before and 10–18 and ≥19 months after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Fourteen patients, with distal leg lymphoedema (i.e., with healthy thighs), who had undergone bariatric surgery served as controls. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for patient age and initial BMI. Results: Adjusted initial thigh volume in patients with lipoedema was 23,785.4 mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 22,316.6–25,254.1). Thigh volumes decreased significantly in lipoedema and control patients (baseline vs. 1st follow-up, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0001; baseline vs. 2nd follow-up, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0013). Adjusted thigh volume reduction amounted to 33.4 and 37.0% in the lipoedema and control groups at the 1st follow-up, and 30.4 and 34.7% at the 2nd follow-up, respectively (lipoedema vs. control p > 0.999 for both). SG and RYGB led to an equal reduction in leg volume (operation type × time, p = 0.83). Volume reduction was equally effective in obese and superobese patients (weight category × time, p = 0.43). Conclusion: SG and RYGB lead to a significant thigh volume reduction in patients with lipoedema.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here