z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cardioversion Safety – Are We Doing Enough?
Author(s) -
Mohsen Khatami,
Marita Knudsen Pope,
Sophie Le Page,
Petra Radić,
Valentina Schirripa,
Irene Grundvold,
Dan Atar
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1421-9751
pISSN - 0008-6312
DOI - 10.1159/000509343
Subject(s) - cardioversion , medicine , atrial fibrillation , cardiology , diabetes mellitus , clinical practice , anesthesia , physical therapy , endocrinology
There is a considerable periprocedural risk of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing cardioversion, and treatment with anticoagulants is therefore a hallmark of cardioversion safety. Based on retrospective subgroup analyses and prospective studies, non-vitamin K anticoagulants are at least as efficient as vitamin K-antagonists in preventing thromboembolic complications after cardioversion. The risk of thromboembolic complications after cardioversion very much depends on the comorbidities in a given patient, and especially heart failure, diabetes, and age >75 years carry a markedly increased risk. Cardioversion has been considered safe within a 48-h time window after onset of atrial fibrillation without prior treatment with anticoagulants, but recent studies have set this practice into question based on e.g. erratic debut assessment of atrial fibrillation. Therefore, a simple and more practical approach is here suggested, where early cardioversion is performed only in hemodynamically unstable patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here