Open AccessImportance of Self and Other in Defining Personality Pathology
Author(s) -
Aaron L. Pincus,
Nicole M. Cain,
Alexandra L. Halberstadt
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
psychopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.867
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1423-033X
pISSN - 0254-4962
DOI - 10.1159/000506313
Subject(s) - personality pathology , personality , psychology , personality disorders , interpersonal communication , empathy , psychopathology , personality assessment inventory , set (abstract data type) , interpersonal relationship , perspective (graphical) , clinical psychology , cognitive psychology , developmental psychology , social psychology , artificial intelligence , computer science , programming language
Criteria A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) defines personality pathology in terms of impairments in "self" (identity, self-direction) and "interpersonal" (empathy, intimacy) functioning. Articulated as a set of dynamic regulatory and relational processes that are stratified in the Level of Personality Functioning Scale, these impairments involve how individuals think and feel about themselves and others and how they relate to others. Defining personality pathology in terms of regulatory and relational processes involving self and other, and distinguishing severity of personality pathology from individual differences in its expression (Criteria B), offers the AMPD several advantages. First, it distinguishes the nature and severity of personality pathology from other forms of psychopathology. Second, it allows the AMPD to integrate personality structure and personality processes. Third, it is highly suitable for synthesis with the Contemporary Integrative Interpersonal Theory of personality. Finally, beyond the interpersonal perspective, it facilitates even broader theoretical and treatment integration.