Open AccessComparison of Cerebroplacental Ratio, Intergrowth-21st Standards, Customized Growth, and Local Population References for the Prediction of Fetal Compromise: Which Is the Best Approach?
Author(s) -
José MoralesRoselló,
Antonio José Cañada-Martínez,
Elisa Scarinci,
Alfredo Perales Marín
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
fetal diagnosis and therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.976
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1421-9964
pISSN - 1015-3837
DOI - 10.1159/000497142
Subject(s) - medicine , gestational age , univariate , apgar score , multivariate analysis , fetus , confidence interval , obstetrics , univariate analysis , population , prospective cohort study , multivariate statistics , pregnancy , statistics , genetics , environmental health , biology , mathematics
The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), Intergrowth 21st standards (IG21), customized growth (CG), and local population references (LPR) in the prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC).