Views of Cohort Study Participants about Returning Research Results in the Context of Precision Medicine | Zendy

Travis Hyams | Zendy; Deborah J. Bowen | Zendy; Celeste M. Condit | Zendy; Jeremy R. Grossman | Zendy; Megan Fitzmaurice | Zendy; Deborah Goodman | Zendy; Lari Wenzel | Zendy; Karen L. Edwards | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Views of Cohort Study Participants about Returning Research Results in the Context of Precision Medicine

Author(s) -

Travis Hyams,

Deborah J. Bowen,

Celeste M. Condit,

Jeremy R. Grossman,

Megan Fitzmaurice,

Deborah Goodman,

Lari Wenzel,

Karen L. Edwards

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

public health genomics

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.701

H-Index - 51

eISSN - 1662-8063

pISSN - 1662-4246

DOI - 10.1159/000448277

Subject(s) - biorepository , context (archaeology) , precision medicine , biobank , cancer genetics , qualitative research , psychology , medline , medicine , human genetics , genetic testing , medical education , gerontology , family medicine , cancer , pathology , bioinformatics , sociology , genetics , paleontology , social science , biology , political science , gene , law

The practice of biorepository-based genetics research raises questions related to what ethical obligations researchers have to their participants. It is important to explore and include the thoughts of current biorepository participants as we move forward with this type of research.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research