
Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone-Aided Remnant Ablation Achieves a Response to Treatment Comparable to That with Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal in Patients with Clinically Relevant Lymph Node Metastases
Author(s) -
Fabián Pitoia,
Erika Abelleira,
Graciela Cross
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
european thyroid journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.23
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 2235-0802
pISSN - 2235-0640
DOI - 10.1159/000369135
Subject(s) - medicine , thyroid , hormone , lymph node , thyroid cancer , ablation , dissection (medical) , urology , surgery , ablation therapy , hormone therapy , cancer , breast cancer , androgen
It has already been shown that remnant ablation in patients with thyroid cancer and lymph node (LN) metastases has similar results when patients are prepared after recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) therapy or thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW). Due to the current changes in the risk-of-recurrence classifications, we decided to evaluate the initial response to treatment and the outcome at medium-term follow-up in 40 consecutive patients with clinically relevant lymph nodes who received radioiodine remnant ablation after rhTSH therapy (n = 20) or THW (n = 20). Each patient received either 100 or 150 mCi 131-I for ablation based on TNM status, and the mean amounts of 131-I used in the 2 groups were not significantly different. An excellent response to treatment was observed in 45% of the patients prepared after rhTSH therapy compared to 20% of those prepared after THW (p = 0.08). Three patients (2 in the THW group and 1 in the rhTSH group) who had N1a in the initial surgery presented with structural persistence as an initial response to treatment. One patient in the THW group had a follow-up of the persistent disease with no surgical treatment, and 2 others received a lateral LN dissection. When the status at final follow-up was considered (median follow-up 3.3 years, range 3-4.2), 60% of the patients ablated after rhTSH therapy were considered with no evidence of disease, compared to 30% of those who underwent THW. The frequency of structural persistence (metastatic LN) was similar in the 2 groups (15 vs. 25%), and the distribution of the responses at final follow-up was not statistically significantly different (p = 0.12). We conclude that preparation after rhTSH therapy seems to be as effective as after THW for patients with clinically relevant LN metastases.