Integration of proprioceptive and visual feedback during online control of reaching | Zendy

Shoko Kasuga | Zendy; Frédéric Crevecoeur | Zendy; Kevin P. Cross | Zendy; Parsa Balalaie | Zendy; Stephen H. Scott | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Integration of proprioceptive and visual feedback during online control of reaching

Author(s) -

Shoko Kasuga,

Frédéric Crevecoeur,

Kevin P. Cross,

Parsa Balalaie,

Stephen H. Scott

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

journal of neurophysiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302

H-Index - 245

eISSN - 1522-1598

pISSN - 0022-3077

DOI - 10.1152/jn.00639.2020

Subject(s) - proprioception , visual feedback , psychology , control (management) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , communication , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , human–computer interaction , computer science , computer vision , artificial intelligence , medicine

Visual feedback is more accurate, but proprioceptive feedback is faster. How should you integrate these sources of feedback to guide limb movement? As predicted by dynamic Bayesian models, the size of the muscle response to a mechanical disturbance was essentially the same whether visual feedback was present or not. Only under artificial conditions, such as when shifting the position of a cursor representing hand position, can one observe a muscle response from visual feedback.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research