z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of the Gibbs and Suga formulations of cardiac energetics: the demise of “isoefficiency”
Author(s) -
JuneChiew Han,
Andrew J. Taberner,
Kenneth Tran,
Soyeon Goo,
David Nickerson,
Martyn P. Nash,
Poul M. F. Nielsen,
EJ Crampin,
Denis S. Loiselle
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of applied physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 8750-7587
pISSN - 1522-1601
DOI - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00693.2011
Subject(s) - isometric exercise , afterload , thermodynamics , chemistry , energetics , gibbs free energy , isotonic , enthalpy , work output , medicine , blood pressure , physics
Two very different sorts of experiments have characterized the field of cardiac energetics over the past three decades. In one of these, Gibbs and colleagues measured the heat production of isolated papillary muscles undergoing isometric contractions and afterloaded isotonic contractions. The former generated roughly linear heat vs. force relationships. The latter generated enthalpy-load relationships, the peak values of which occurred at or near peak isometric force, i.e., at a relative load of unity. Contractile efficiency showed a pronounced dependence on afterload. By contrast, Suga and coworkers measured the oxygen consumption (Vo(2)) while recording the pressure-volume-time work loops of blood-perfused isolated dog hearts. From the associated (linear) end-systolic pressure-volume relations they derived a quantity labeled pressure-volume area (PVA), consisting of the sum of pressure-volume work and unspent elastic energy and showed that this was linearly correlated with Vo(2) over a wide range of conditions. This linear dependence imposed isoefficiency: constant contractile efficiency independent of afterload. Neither these data nor those of Gibbs and colleagues are in dispute. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts over the years, no demonstration of either compatibility or incompatibility of these disparate characterizations of cardiac energetics has been forthcoming. We demonstrate that compatibility between the two formulations is thwarted by the concept of isoefficiency, the thermodynamic basis of which we show to be untenable.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here