
Effects of myocardial function and systemic circulation on regional coronary perfusion
Author(s) -
Ravi Namani,
Lik C Lee,
Yoram Lanir,
Benjamin Kaimovitz,
Sheikh Mohammad Shavik,
Ghassan S. Kassab
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of applied physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 8750-7587
pISSN - 1522-1601
DOI - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00450.2019
Subject(s) - endocardium , cardiology , contractility , perfusion , coronary circulation , medicine , microcirculation , apex (geometry) , blood flow , anatomy
Cardiac-coronary interaction and the effects of its pathophysiological variations on spatial heterogeneity of coronary perfusion and myocardial work are still poorly understood. This hypothesis-generating study predicts spatial heterogeneities in both regional cardiac work and perfusion that offer a new paradigm on the vulnerability of the subendocardium to ischemia, particularly at the apex. We propose a mathematical and computational modeling framework to simulate the interaction of left ventricular mechanics, systemic circulation, and coronary microcirculation. The computational simulations revealed that the relaxation rate of the myocardium has a significant effect whereas the contractility has a marginal effect on both the magnitude and transmural distribution of coronary perfusion. The ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial perfusion density ( Q endo /Q epi ) changed by -12 to +6% from a baseline value of 1.16 when myocardial contractility was varied by +25 and -10%, respectively; Q endo /Q epi changed by 37% when sarcomere relaxation rate, b , was faster and increased by 10% from the baseline value. The model predicts axial differences in regional myocardial work and perfusion density across the wall thickness. Regional myofiber work done at the apex is 30-50% lower than at the center region, whereas perfusion density in the apex is lower by only 18% compared with the center. There are large axial differences in coronary flow and myocardial work at the subendocardial locations, with the highest differences located at the apex region. A mismatch exists between perfusion density and regional work done at the subendocardium. This mismatch is speculated to be compensated by coronary autoregulation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present a model of left ventricle perfusion based on an anatomically realistic coronary tree structure that includes its interaction with the systemic circulation. Left ventricular relaxation rate has a significant effect on the regional distribution of coronary flow and myocardial work.