Open AccessInvestigation of the Photoinduced Deposition Mechanism and Interfacial Properties Related to the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Pb/Cu–Au Bimetallic Nanocrystals
Author(s) -
Haiyan Xu,
Ziwei Sun,
Jing Pei,
Pengtao Sheng,
Weili Li,
Songtian Li
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of the electrochemical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.258
H-Index - 271
eISSN - 1945-7111
pISSN - 0013-4651
DOI - 10.1149/1945-7111/ac5a18
Subject(s) - overpotential , bimetallic strip , chemical engineering , deposition (geology) , nanocrystal , materials science , photocatalysis , noble metal , electrolyte , inorganic chemistry , metal , chemistry , nanotechnology , electrochemistry , catalysis , metallurgy , electrode , paleontology , biochemistry , sediment , biology , engineering
Modifying TiO 2 with noble metal nanocrystals via photodeposition is an efficient strategy for improving its photoelectrochemical performance. The photodeposition process is still an open question and needs to be further clarified. Herein, we selectively deposited Pb or Cu on Au nanocrystals supported by the branched TiO 2 nanostructure to prepare the Au@metal/semiconductor photocatalyst. The results revealed the dependence of the photodeposition mechanism on the type of electrolyte. In an acetic acid–acetate system Pb deposition on Au undergoes both underpotential and overpotential deposition processes, while Cu deposition on Au only displays overpotential deposition behavior. In a nitric acid–nitrate system, however, only underpotential deposition occurs during Pb deposition on Au. Surface microstructure analysis shows that the Cu–Au bimetallic nanocrystals form a typical core/shell structure, while Pb–Au has a Janus structure. The lower ideality factor of Cu/Au–TiO 2 than that of Pb/Au–TiO 2 indicates an ideal photoelectrode/electrolyte junction for photoelectrochemical reaction, further enhancing carrier transport with a short recombination lifetime of 0.899 ms. Finally, the evaluation of photoelectrochemical performance further confirmed Cu/Au–TiO 2 (Au loading amount of about 0.55 mass%) as the optimal photocatalyst, with an efficiency as high as 0.29% or about 1.93 times that of Au–TiO 2 (0.15%).