z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Graphite Particle-Size Induced Morphological and Performance Changes of Graphite–Silicon Electrodes
Author(s) -
Fabian Jeschull,
Yuri Surace,
Simone Zürcher,
Giacomo M. Lari,
Michael E. Spahr,
Petr Novák,
Sigita Trabesinger
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the electrochemical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.258
H-Index - 271
eISSN - 1945-7111
pISSN - 0013-4651
DOI - 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9b9a
Subject(s) - graphite , materials science , electrode , composite material , faraday efficiency , silicon , void (composites) , particle (ecology) , electrochemistry , metallurgy , chemistry , oceanography , geology
Silicon is a long-standing candidate for replacing graphite as the active material in negative electrodes for Li-ion batteries, due to its significantly higher specific capacity. However, Si suffers from rapid capacity fading, as a result of the large volume expansion upon lithiation. As an alternative to pure Si electrodes, Si could be used, instead, as a capacity-enhancing additive in graphite electrodes. Such graphite–Si blended electrodes exhibit lower irreversible-charge losses during the formation of the passivation layer and maintain a better electronic contact than pure Si electrodes. While previous works have mostly focused on the Si properties and Si content, this study investigates how the choice of graphite matrix can alter the electrode properties. By varying the type of graphite and the Si content (5 or 20 wt%), different electrode morphologies were obtained and their capacity retention upon long-term cycling was studied. Despite unfavorable electrode morphologies, such as large void spaces and poor active-material distribution, certain types of graphites with large particle sizes were found to be competitive with graphite–Si blends, containing smaller graphite particles. In an attempt to mitigate excess void-space and inhomogeneous material distribution, two approaches were examined: densification (calendering) and blending in a fraction of smaller graphite particles. While the former approach led in general to poorer capacity retention, the latter yielded an improved Coulombic efficiency without compromising the cycling performance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom