Open AccessObstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of 3,028 Singletons Born After Advanced ART Techniques: Ejaculated Sperm Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection, Artificial Oocyte Activation, in Vitro Maturation and Testicular Sperm Extraction
Author(s) -
Hiroyuki Hattori,
Yuko Atsumi,
Yukiko Nakajo,
Nobuya Aono,
Masae Koizumi,
Mayumi Toya,
Hideki Igarashi,
Koichi Kyono
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
fertility and reproduction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2661-3182
pISSN - 2661-3174
DOI - 10.1142/s2661318221500031
Subject(s) - intracytoplasmic sperm injection , sperm , medicine , assisted reproductive technology , andrology , in vitro fertilisation , gynecology , embryo transfer , odds ratio , live birth , oocyte , pregnancy , obstetrics , embryo , infertility , biology , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology
Background: To evaluate obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singletons conceived after advanced assisted reproductive technology (ART) techniques: conventional IVF pregnancies (C-IVF), ejaculated sperm intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), assisted oocyte activation (AOA), in vitro maturation (IVM), and testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Methods: The subjects were 3,028 singletons who were born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The subjects were separated into five groups: C-IVF (n = 855), ICSI (n = 1,869), AOA (n = 42), IVM (n = 32), and TESE (n = 230). We evaluated obstetrical and neonatal outcomes calculating the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) using multivariable logistic regression analyses for fresh and frozen embryos and for cleavage and blastocyst transfer. The C-IVF group was used as a background control for the ICSI group. Moreover, the TESE, AOA, and IVM groups were compared to the ICSI group to evaluate the effects of the ICSI procedure itself. Results: The incidence of perinatal complications was significantly lower in the ICSI-fresh group (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10–0.83, p ¡ 0.05). Regarding sex ratio, the IVM was significantly associated with sex ratio imbalance toward female in both fresh and frozen groups (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10–0.96, AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07–0.98, p ¡ 0.05). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in preterm birth rate, low birth weight rate and congenital abnormalities rate between conventional IVF, ICSI, and the other groups. Conclusions: There were no negative effects on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between conventional IVF and ICSI. Although this was a limited sample size study, advanced ART technologies such as AOA, IVM, and TESE also seem to have a low risk of adverse impact on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes but may have a slight impact on sex ratio.