z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative study on Photobiomodulation between 630 nm and 810 nm LED in diabetic wound healing both in vitro and in vivo
Author(s) -
Hongyou Zhao,
Tengda Ji,
Tianzhen Sun,
Haolin Liu,
Yidi Liu,
Defu Chen,
Ying Wang,
Yi-Zhou Tan,
Jing Zeng,
Haixia Qiu,
Ying Gu
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of innovative optical health sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.421
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1793-5458
pISSN - 1793-7205
DOI - 10.1142/s1793545822500109
Subject(s) - in vivo , wound healing , in vitro , irradiation , light emitting diode , fibroblast , medicine , chemistry , physics , optoelectronics , biology , surgery , biochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , nuclear physics
Photobiomodulation (PBM) promoting wound healing has been demonstrated by many studies. Currently, 630 nm and 810 nm light-emitting diodes (LEDs), as light sources, are frequently used in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in clinics. However, the dose–effect relationship of LED-mediated PBM is not fully understood. Furthermore, among the 630[Formula: see text]nm and 810[Formula: see text]nm LEDs, which one gets a better effect on accelerating the wound healing of diabetic ulcers is not clear. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of 630[Formula: see text]nm and 810[Formula: see text]nm LED-mediated PBM in wound healing both in vitro and in vivo. Our results showed that both 630[Formula: see text]nm and 810[Formula: see text]nm LED irradiation significantly promoted the proliferation of mouse fibroblast cells (L929) at different light irradiances (1, 5, and 10[Formula: see text]mW/cm[Formula: see text]. The cell proliferation rate increased with the extension of irradiation time (100, 200, and 500[Formula: see text]s), but it decreased when the irradiation time was over 500[Formula: see text]s. Both 630[Formula: see text]nm and 810[Formula: see text]nm LED irradiation (5[Formula: see text]mW/cm[Formula: see text] significantly improved the migration capability of L929 cells. No difference between 630[Formula: see text]nm and 810[Formula: see text]nm LED-mediated PBM in promoting cell proliferation and migration was detected. In vivo results presented that both 630[Formula: see text]nm and 810[Formula: see text]nm LED irradiation promoted the wound healing and the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF) in the wounded skin of type 2 diabetic mice. Overall, these results suggested that LED-mediated PBM promotes wound healing of diabetic mice through promoting fibroblast cell proliferation, migration, and the expression of growth factors in the wounded skin. LEDs (630[Formula: see text]nm and 810[Formula: see text]nm) have a similar outcome in promoting wound healing of type 2 diabetic mice.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom