Open AccessA RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ON THE EFFECTS OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY INTERVENTIONS USING PATIENT-CENTERED ROBOT-ASSISTED REHABILITATION FOR FUNCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT IN SUBACUTE STROKE PATIENTS
Author(s) -
Daeseok Yoon,
Seungbok Lee,
Sang Hyun Cho,
Hae-Yean Park,
Jong-Bae Kim
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of mechanics in medicine and biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.236
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1793-6810
pISSN - 0219-5194
DOI - 10.1142/s0219519421400406
Subject(s) - rehabilitation , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , activities of daily living , medicine , randomized controlled trial , upper limb , generalizability theory , occupational therapy , stroke (engine) , psychology , surgery , mechanical engineering , developmental psychology , engineering
The objective of this research study was to investigate the effect of patient-centered robot-assisted intervention for upper limb function improvement in stroke patients. Design: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Intervention: Subjectively preferred areas of need for performing daily activities were identified by pre-interviewing and applied as target goals in the experimental group using a robotic device. Control-1 underwent a program focused on the robot system involving movements of upper limb joints. Control-2 participated in a conventional rehabilitation program. Methods: Forty-five participants engaged in 60 min of daily therapy, five times weekly for 3 weeks. The experimental group used the Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM) to identify subjectively preferred “patient-centered” focus needed areas to perform robotic device aided daily activities. Control-1 used a robot device-focused rehabilitation involving upper limb joint movements. Control-2 participated in conventional rehabilitation. Pre-post intervention measurements of hand, grip, power, and upper limb ROM were acquired by FMA-UE, MFT, and K-MBI. Results: A significant increase of function in the experimental group was observed in each subclass of function and activities of daily living (ADL) performance. Control-1 showed an increase in function without ADL improvement. Control-2 showed an increase in ADL and proximal areas of upper limb function without an increase in other areas. Conclusion: The “patient-centered” approach significantly improved upper limb function and ADL performance compared to “robot-centered” rehabilitation. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results and for generalizability in clinical application.