Open AccessDisturbing to restore? Effects of mounding on understory communities on seismic lines in treed peatlands
Author(s) -
Laureen F. I. Echiverri,
S. Ellen Macdonald,
Scott E. Nielsen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
canadian journal of forest research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1208-6037
pISSN - 0045-5067
DOI - 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0092
Subject(s) - understory , peat , geology , forb , environmental science , disturbance (geology) , vegetation (pathology) , shrub , canopy , ecology , geomorphology , grassland , biology , medicine , pathology
In peatlands, microtopography strongly affects understory plant communities. Disturbance can result in a loss of microtopographic variation, primarily through the loss of hummocks. To address this, mounding treatments can be used to restore microtopography. We examined the effects of mounding on the understory vegetation on seismic lines in wooded fens. Seismic lines are deforested linear corridors (∼3 to 8 m wide) created for oil and gas exploration. Our objectives were to compare the recovery of understory communities on unmounded and mounded seismic lines and determine how recovery varies with microtopographic position. Recovery was evident in the unmounded seismic lines, with higher shrub and total understory cover at the “tops” of the small, natural hummocks than at lower microtopographic positions — much like the trends in adjacent treed fens. In contrast, mounding treatments that artificially created hummocks on seismic lines significantly changed understory communities. Mounded seismic lines had higher forb cover, much lower bryophyte cover, less variation along the microtopographic gradient, and community composition less similar to that of the reference sites than unmounded seismic lines due to higher abundance of marsh-associated species. Our results suggest that mounding narrow seismic lines can be detrimental to the recovery of the understory communities in treed peatlands.