Premium
Ultrasound of the normal canine supraspinatus tendon: comparison with gross anatomy and histology
Author(s) -
Lassaigne Caroline Chloe,
Boyer Charlotte,
Sautier Lucile,
Taeymans Olivier
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
veterinary record
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.261
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2042-7670
pISSN - 0042-4900
DOI - 10.1136/vr.105552
Subject(s) - echogenicity , medicine , anatomy , tendon , cadaver , tendinosis , ultrasound , tendinopathy , tendonitis , histology , shoulders , gross anatomy , biceps , pathology , radiology
Background This study aimed to compare the ultrasonographic and histological features of the supraspinatus tendon (ST) and its peculiar appearance in contrast with the biceps brachii tendon. Methods For this purpose, 19 non‐lame dog cadavers were subjected to an ultrasonographic and histologic evaluation of both shoulders after postmortem examination. Results Close to their insertion on the greater tubercle, all STs displayed a widened portion with a deep central hypoechoic area lacking a fibrillar pattern, when compared with its more proximal aspect and adjacent biceps brachii. Histologically this deep portion corresponded to poorly organised collagen bundles interspersed within a myxoid substance mainly composed of mucopolysaccharides. This central myxoid area with collagen disarray was responsible for the reduced echogenicity on ultrasound. Conclusion The focal widening of the ST insertion and its central mucopolysaccharidic composition could be an anatomical adaptation to marked forces specifically applied to this tendon. However, the ultrasound and histological appearances are very similar to those described in tendinosis, which represents a confounding factor in diagnosing tendonitis at the insertion of the supraspinatus. In the absence of other ultrasonographic criteria of tendinopathy, a hypoechoic central area in the ST near its insertion should be considered normal.