Open AccessComparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
Author(s) -
Deckers Nynke,
Ruigrok Catharina A,
Verhoeve Hans Peter,
Lourens Nicky
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
veterinary record open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.504
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2052-6113
DOI - 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000262
Subject(s) - beagle , medicine , subcutaneous injection , anesthesia , intramuscular injection , antiemetic , nausea
The antiemetic maropitant, with metacresol as preservative (Cerenia, Zoetis), has been associated with pain after subcutaneous injection in dogs and cats. Recently, a generic formulation containing benzyl alcohol was authorised (Prevomax, Le Vet). Benzyl alcohol is reported to have local anaesthetic properties and reduce injection pain. This study compared local pain after subcutaneous injection of the two maropitant formulations, administered at approximately 4°C and 25°C, to dogs. Thirty‐two healthy beagle dogs were enrolled into a blinded, randomised, cross‐over study. Dogs received subcutaneous injections of maropitant injection containing metacresol as preservative and maropitant injection containing benzyl alcohol as preservative, both at approximately 4°C and 25°C, with at least three days in between treatments. Injection pain was evaluated by two blinded observers using a visual analogue scale immediately after injection and a simple descriptive scale at two minutes after injection. In healthy beagle dogs, subcutaneous injection of maropitant with benzyl alcohol is significantly less painful than injection of maropitant with metacresol.