Open AccessVeterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners
Author(s) -
De Briyne Nancy,
Gopal Raquel,
Diesel Gillian,
Iatridou Despoina,
O'Rourke Declan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
veterinary record open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.504
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2052-6113
DOI - 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000224
Subject(s) - pharmacovigilance , agency (philosophy) , medicine , animal welfare , veterinary medicine , animal health , adverse effect , medical education , business , pharmacology , ecology , philosophy , epistemology , biology
A web‐based survey was conducted by the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe with the support of the European Medicines Agency to gain a better insight into the adverse event reporting habits of veterinary practitioners and the level of information on reported adverse events that flows back to them. It was completed by 3545 veterinarians. The findings indicate marked under‐reporting and that the system is poorly equipped to deal with lack of expected efficacy, with few cases reported and most found to be inconclusive. It was also found that feedback systems are greatly lacking. In order to increase spontaneous reporting, there is a need to make reporting easier (eg, by developing mobile apps, to incorporate the reporting into the practice management system software) and to make veterinarians better aware of the importance of reporting and the added value it may bring. Feedback systems should be improved. The best way to motivate reporters is to demonstrate that the reports they submit are indeed useful and contribute to the improved use of veterinary medicinal products. The major role veterinarians can play in improving animal health, welfare and public health by reporting adverse events needs to be further promoted.