z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Suppression of the hypomethylated Moloney leukemia virus genome in undifferentiated teratocarcinoma cells and inefficiency of transformation by a bacterial gene under control of the long terminal repeat.
Author(s) -
Ohtsura Niwa
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
molecular and cellular biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.14
H-Index - 327
eISSN - 1067-8824
pISSN - 0270-7306
DOI - 10.1128/mcb.5.9.2325
Subject(s) - biology , microbiology and biotechnology , teratocarcinoma , transfection , plasmid , long terminal repeat , murine leukemia virus , gene , rous sarcoma virus , retrovirus , cell culture , genome , cellular differentiation , genetics
The Moloney leukemia virus (M-MuLV) genome was introduced into undifferentiated teratocarcinoma cells by transfection of a plasmid with the virus genome linked to pSV2neo, which carries a bacterial drug resistance gene, neo, or by cotransfection with pSV2neo. In the resulting cells, the M-MuLV genome remained hypomethylated, but its expression was suppressed in cells in an undifferentiated state. The pattern of DNA methylation of the viral genome remained unchanged when the cells were induced to differentiate into epithelial tissues. However, spontaneous M-MuLV expression was detected with differentiation of the cells. To determine to what extent the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) was responsible for this suppression in undifferentiated cells, I constructed plasmids in which neo was placed under the control of the promoter sequence of the dihydrofolate reductase gene or the M-MuLV LTR, and compared the biological activities of the plasmids in Ltk- cells and in undifferentiated teratocarcinoma cells. In Ltk- cells, these plasmids were highly efficient in making the cells resistant to selection by G418. However, in undifferentiated teratocarcinoma cells, the M-MuLV LTR promoted neo gene expression at only 10% of the expected efficiency, as compared with the expression of the neo gene under the control of the simian virus to or dihydrofolate reductase promoter. Thus, the mechanisms of gene regulation are not the same in undifferentiated and differentiated teratocarcinoma cells.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here