Open AccessC/EBP Factor Suppression of Inhibition of Type II Secreted Phospholipase A2 Promoter in HepG2 Cells: Possible Role of Single-Strand Binding Proteins
Author(s) -
Qishi Fan,
Michel Paradon,
Colette Salvat,
G. Béréziat,
JeanLuc Olivier
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
molecular and cellular biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.14
H-Index - 327
eISSN - 1067-8824
pISSN - 0270-7306
DOI - 10.1128/mcb.17.8.4238
Subject(s) - biology , microbiology and biotechnology , transcription factor , binding site , promoter , dna binding protein , transcription (linguistics) , consensus sequence , response element , biochemistry , peptide sequence , gene , gene expression , linguistics , philosophy
We previously reported that the type II secreted phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) promoter from positions (-326 to +20) ([-326;+20] promoter) is negatively regulated by two adjacent regulatory elements, C (-210 to -176) and D (-247 to -210). This study examines in greater detail the way in which this negative regulation operates. Successive 5' deletions of the [-326;+20] type II sPLA2 promoter indicated that the region upstream of position -195 inhibits the transcription activity sixfold in HepG2 cells but not in HeLa cells. Although the whole [-326;-176] region decreased the activity of a heterologous thymidine kinase promoter, this effect was orientation and position sensitive. C/EBP beta, C/EBP alpha, and C/EBP delta, which bind to element C, prevented the inhibition of promoter activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift experiments identified the binding of NF1-like proteins to the [-225;-218] site, which overlaps an insulin response-like sequence, 5'-TGTTTTG-3'. This sequence bound a factor which also recognized the promoters of the apolipoproteins C-III and A-II. Substitutions preventing the binding of this factor or the NF1-like proteins did not increase the transcription activity, but substitution in the [-217;-204] sequence blocked the transcription inhibition. This sequence did not bind any double-strand binding factor, but its antisense strand is critical for the binding of single-strand binding proteins to the [-232;-191] region. We therefore suggest that these single-strand binding proteins are involved in the inhibitory mechanism.