Open AccessQuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with Chemiluminescence Immunoassay: Do We Need a Higher Cutoff?
Author(s) -
Francesco Bisognin,
Giuseppe Lombardi,
Maria Carla Re,
Paola Dal Monte
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.349
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1070-633X
pISSN - 0095-1137
DOI - 10.1128/jcm.00780-20
Subject(s) - chemiluminescence , immunoassay , gold standard (test) , interferon γ , latent tuberculosis , tuberculosis , medicine , mycobacterium tuberculosis , interferon gamma , quantiferon , immunology , chemistry , chromatography , pathology , antibody , cytokine
QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is the most widely used interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The aim of this study was to compare QFT-Plus results by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on the SkyLab system with those obtained with chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) on the Liaison XL analyzer. Agreement between the two assays was evaluated on 419 QFT-Plus blood samples and was found to be substantial (75.4%); higher agreement was found for positive (95.4%) and negative (80.4%) results, while most discordances were due to ELISA-indeterminate/CLIA-determinate results. According to Italian Clinical Microbiologist Association recommendations, in samples ( n = 79) with a borderline result in ELISA (0.20 to 0.70 IU/ml), CLIA median values statistically increased (from 0.29 to 0.59 IU/ml for TB1 and from 0.32 to 0.60 IU/ml for TB2) but remained in the borderline range. Linear regression analysis indicated a substantial correlation between ELISA and CLIA for antigen tubes TB1 (Pearson's r = 0.8666) and TB2 (Pearson's r = 0.8728), but CLIA produced higher values than ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value in CLIA was 0.45 IU/ml for TB1 and 0.46 IU/ml for TB2. In conclusion, automated QFT-Plus with CLIA is comparable to QFT-Plus performed by ELISA. Within the linearity range of the test, CLIA detects higher quantitative values than ELISA, resulting in a higher number of determinate results and the conversion of samples that were close to the cutoff into positive borderline results. A higher cutoff for QFT-CLIA needs to be defined based on clinical diagnostic criteria.