Open AccessComparative Analysis of the Euroimmun CXCL13 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and the ReaScan Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Diagnosis of Lyme Neuroborreliosis
Author(s) -
Katharina Ziegler,
Anca Rath,
Christoph Schoerner,
Renate Meyer,
Thomas Bertsch,
Frank Erbguth,
Christian Bogdan,
Jörg Steinmann,
Jürgen Held
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.349
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1070-633X
pISSN - 0095-1137
DOI - 10.1128/jcm.00207-20
Subject(s) - lyme neuroborreliosis , cxcl13 , medicine , borrelia burgdorferi , immunology , neuroborreliosis , cerebrospinal fluid , viral meningitis , lyme disease , virology , pathology , antibody , chemokine , inflammation , bacterial meningitis , chemokine receptor
Diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is challenging, as long as Borrelia -specific intrathecal antibodies are not yet detectable. The chemokine CXCL13 is elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of LNB patients. Here, we compared the performances of the Euroimmun CXCL13 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CXCL13 ELISA) and the ReaScan CXCL13 lateral flow immunoassay (CXCL13 LFA), a rapid point-of-care test, to support the diagnosis of LNB. In a dual-center case-control study, CSF samples from 90 patients (34 with definite LNB, 10 with possible LNB, and 46 with other central nervous system [CNS] diseases [non-LNB group]) were analyzed with the CXCL13 ELISA and the CXCL13 LFA. Classification of patients followed the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) guidelines on LNB. The CXCL13 ELISA detected elevated CXCL13 levels in all patients with definite LNB (median, 1,409 pg/ml) compared to the non-LNB controls (median, 20.7 pg/ml; P < 0.0001), with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 84.8% (cutoff value, 78.6 pg/ml; area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve, 0.93). Similarly, the CXCL13 LFA yielded elevated CXCL13 levels in 31 patients with definite LNB (median arbitrary value, 223.5) compared to the non-LNB control patients (median arbitrary value, 0; P < 0.0001) and had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.2% and 93.5%, respectively (cutoff arbitrary value, 22.5; area under the ROC curve, 0.94). The correlation between the CXCL13 levels obtained by ELISA and LFA was strong (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.89; P < 0.0001). The CXCL13 ELISA and the CXCL13 LFA are comparable diagnostic tools for the detection of CXCL13 in the CSF of patients with definite LNB. The advantage of the CXCL13 LFA is the shorter time to result.