Open AccessRapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species
Author(s) -
Rytas Vilgalys,
Micah Hester
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of bacteriology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.652
H-Index - 246
eISSN - 1067-8832
pISSN - 0021-9193
DOI - 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
Subject(s) - biology , restriction enzyme , cryptococcus neoformans , restriction site , ribosomal dna , restriction fragment length polymorphism , polymerase chain reaction , restriction digest , restriction map , genetics , restriction fragment , amplified ribosomal dna restriction analysis , dna profiling , amplified fragment length polymorphism , primer (cosmetics) , terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism , dna , microbiology and biotechnology , gene , genetic diversity , plasmid , phylogenetics , population , chemistry , demography , organic chemistry , sociology
Detailed restriction analyses of many samples often require substantial amounts of time and effort for DNA extraction, restriction digests, Southern blotting, and hybridization. We describe a novel approach that uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for rapid simplified restriction typing and mapping of DNA from many different isolates. DNA fragments up to 2 kilobase pairs in length were efficiently amplified from crude DNA samples of several pathogenic Cryptococcus species, including C. neoformans, C. albidus, C. laurentii, and C. uniguttulatus. Digestion and electrophoresis of the PCR products by using frequent-cutting restriction enzymes produced complex restriction phenotypes (fingerprints) that were often unique for each strain or species. We used the PCR to amplify and analyze restriction pattern variation within three major portions of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats from these fungi. Detailed mapping of many restriction sites within the rDNA locus was determined by fingerprint analysis of progressively larger PCR fragments sharing a common primer site at one end. As judged by PCR fingerprints, the rDNA of 19 C. neoformans isolates showed no variation for four restriction enzymes that we surveyed. Other Cryptococcus spp. showed varying levels of restriction pattern variation within their rDNAs and were shown to be genetically distinct from C. neoformans. The PCR primers used in this study have also been successfully applied for amplification of rDNAs from other pathogenic and nonpathogenic fungi, including Candida spp., and ought to have wide applicability for clinical detection and other studies.