English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

LY303366 is a novel antifungal echinocandin with excellent in vitro activity againstAspergillus spp. We compared four doses (1, 2.5, 10, and 25 mg/kg of body weight) of LY303366 with amphotericin B (0.5 to 5 mg/kg) in a temporarily neutropenic murine model of invasive aspergillosis against an amphotericin B-susceptible (AF210) and an amphotericin B-resistant (AF65)Aspergillus fumigatus isolate based on in vivo response. Mice were immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) and infected 3 days later. Treatment started 18 h after infection and lasted for 10 days. LY303366 was given once daily intravenously for 10 days, and amphotericin B (at 0.5, 2, and 5 mg/kg) was given once daily intraperitoneally for 10 days, or only on days 1, 2, 4, and 7 (at 5 mg/kg). Kidneys and lungs from survivors were cultured on day 11. Control mice in both experiments had 90 to 100% mortality. Amphotericin B at 0.5 mg/kg and LY303366 at 1 mg/kg yielded 10 to 20% survival rates for mice infected with either AF210 or AF65. Amphotericin B at 2 and 5 (both regimens) mg/kg yielded a 70 to 100% survival rate for mice infected with AF210 but a 10 to 30% survival rate for mice infected with AF65 (P = 0.01 to 0.04 compared with AF210). Against AF210 and AF65, LY303366 at 2.5, 10, and 25 mg/kg produced a survival rate of 70 to 80%, which was as effective as amphotericin B for AF210, but superior to amphotericin B for AF65 (P &lt; 0.03 to 0.0006). For AF65, LY303366 at 10 and 25 mg/kg/day was superior to amphotericin B at 2 and 5 mg/kg/day in reducing tissue colony counts (P = 0.01 to 0.003), and for AF210, amphotericin B at 5 mg/kg/day and at 5 mg/kg in four doses was more effective than all four regimens of LY303366 in reducing renal culture counts (P = 0.01 to 0.0001). The present study shows, for the first time, that in vivo resistance ofA. fumigatus to amphotericin B exists, although this could not be detected by in vitro susceptibility assays. Furthermore, LY303366 appears to be effective against amphotericin B-susceptible and -resistantA. fumigatus infection in this model and should be further evaluated clinically.

Efficacy of LY303366 against Amphotericin B-Susceptible and -Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in a Murine Model of Invasive Aspergillosis