English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

While CD4 cell counts are widely used to predict disease progression in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, they are poorly explanatory of the progression to AIDS or death after the introduction of chemotherapy. Changes in HIV load (as measured by RNA PCR) have been shown to be a much better predictor of the risk of disease progression. Since the interrelationship of these markers is of great clinical interest, we modeled the time-averaged return of CD4 cell count and change in viral load subsequent to therapy with the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir. We found that CD4 cell return was significantly related to both the baseline CD4 count (r 2 = 0.86,P &lt; 0.001) and the decline in HIV RNA PCR-determined viral load (also referred to in this work as the HIV RNA PCR decline) (r 2 = 0.60,P &lt; 0.01). Simultaneously modeling both influences in a linked nonlinear model (r 2 = 0.93,P &lt; 0.001) demonstrated that (i) the starting number of CD4 cells accounted for the majority of the change in CD4 cell return and (ii) the return of CD4 cells attributable to viral load decrease was 50% of maximal with only a decrease of approximately 0.2 log of HIV RNA as modeled from the first 12 weeks of therapy. Much greater viral inhibition beyond that necessary for maximal CD4 cell return is possible. Given that HIV RNA PCR decline is more strongly linked to ultimate clinical course in HIV disease, our findings indicate that CD4 return is potentially misleading as an indicator of antiviral effect, since it is determined more by the starting CD4 value than by viral load decline and since near-maximal changes occur with minimal antiviral effect.

Mathematical Modeling of the Interrelationship of CD4 Lymphocyte Count and Viral Load Changes Induced by the Protease Inhibitor Indinavir