z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Randomized, double-blind comparison of ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for complicated urinary tract infections
Author(s) -
Jean M. Allais,
Laurel C. Preheim,
Thomas A. Cuevas,
Jane S. Roccaforte,
Martha A. Mellencamp,
Marvin J. Bittner
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.07
H-Index - 259
eISSN - 1070-6283
pISSN - 0066-4804
DOI - 10.1128/aac.32.9.1327
Subject(s) - trimethoprim , ciprofloxacin , sulfamethoxazole , urinary system , medicine , antibacterial agent , antibiotics , gastroenterology , surgery , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the effect of ciprofloxacin (250 mg orally, twice daily) was compared with that of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160 mg of trimethoprim and 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole orally, twice daily) on 45 patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Pretherapy isolates were all members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Isolates were eradicated from 18 (82%) of 22 patients treated with ciprofloxacin and 12 (52%) of 23 patients treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole during and 5 to 9 days after therapy (P = 0.035). Both groups had similar relapse and reinfection rates at 4 to 6 weeks posttherapy. Adverse effects were mild and reversible, occurring in 1 of 22 in the ciprofloxacin group and 6 of 23 in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group. Disk diffusion susceptibility tests correlated better with broth macrodilution for ciprofloxacin than for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Ciprofloxacin is a safe, effective alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here