Open AccessLimited accuracy of dose calculation for large fields at deep depths using the BrainSCAN v5.21 treatment‐planning system
Author(s) -
Hsi Wen C.,
Zhang Yunkai,
Kirk Michael C.,
Bernard Damian,
Chu James C.H.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.1999
Subject(s) - radiation treatment planning , computer science , environmental science , medical physics , physics , radiology , medicine , radiation therapy
The Varian 120 multileaf collimator (MLC) has a leaf thickness of 5 mm projected at the isocenter plane and can deliver a radiation beam of large field size (up to 30 cm) to be used in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Often the dose must be delivered to depths greater than 20 cm. Therefore, during the commissioning of the BrainSCAN v5.21 or any radiation treatment‐planning (RTP) systems, extensive testing of dose and monitor unit calculations must encompass the field sizes (1 cm to 30 cm) and the prescription depths (1 cm to 20 cm). Accordingly, the central‐axis percent depth doses (PDDs) and off‐axis percentage profiles must be measured at several depths for various field sizes. The data for this study were acquired with a 6‐MV X‐ray beam from a Varian 2100EX LINAC with a water phantom at a source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm. These measurements were also used to generate a photon beam module, based on a photon pencil beam dose‐calculation algorithm with a fast‐Fourier transform method. To commission the photon beam module used in our BrainSCAN RTP system, we performed a quantitative comparison of measured and calculated central‐axis depth doses and off‐axis profiles. Utilizing the principles of dose difference and distance‐to‐agreement introduced by Van Dyk et al. [Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993; 26:261—273], agreements between calculated and measured doses are < 2 % and < 2 mm for the regions of low‐ and high‐dose gradients, respectively. However, large errors (up to ~ 5 % and ~ 7 % for 20‐cm and 30‐cm fields, respectively, at the depth 20 cm) were observed for monitor unit calculations. For a given field size, the disagreement increased with the depth. Similarly, for a given depth the disagreement also increased with the field size. These large systematic errors were caused by using the tissue maximum ratio (TMR) in BrainSCAN v5.21 without considering increased field size as depth increased. These errors have been reported to BrainLAB. PACS number: 87.53.‐j