Open AccessUsing the frame averaging of aS500 EPID for IMRT verification
Author(s) -
Chang J.,
Ling C. C.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2499
Subject(s) - linear particle accelerator , standard deviation , computer science , calibration , frame (networking) , linear regression , nuclear medicine , data acquisition , beam (structure) , image guided radiation therapy , mathematics , statistics , optics , physics , artificial intelligence , medical imaging , medicine , telecommunications , operating system
In this study, we evaluated the use of aS500 EPID for the verification of IMRT beam delivery, using the synchronous, frame‐averaging acquisition. In this approach, an EPID continuously integrates frames while irradiated by an IMRT field; the averaged image is then converted to a dose profile using a linear calibration curve, and is compared with the planned profiles using a linear‐regression model, which returns an index σ (root mean squared error) for the goodness of fit. We identified several potential errors in this acquisition mode: missing data between the start of irradiation and imaging, and from the last (incomplete) frame, which we proved are insignificant for IMRT fields; and EPID dead time during irradiation stemming from data transfer, which we successfully corrected for clinical MU ( > 100 ) . We compared the measured relative profiles and central axis dose of 25 prostate fields with the planned ones. Applying our correction methods, very good agreement was obtained between the measured and planned profiles with a mean a of 1.9% and a standard deviation of 0.5%; for central‐axis dose the agreement was better than 2.0%. We conclude that the aS500 is an effective tool for verification of IM beam delivery in the range of clinical MU ( > 100 ) settings. Although the vender is developing an upgrade to fix similar problems, our results demonstrate that the current configuration with simple correction schemes can achieve satisfactory results. PACS number(s): 87.53.Oq, 87.53.Xd