z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of monitor unit calculations performed with a 3D computerized planning system and independent “hand” calculations: Results of three years clinical experience
Author(s) -
Chan Jackson,
Russell David,
Peters Victor G.,
Farrell Thomas J.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2553
Subject(s) - monitor unit , radiation treatment planning , unit (ring theory) , computer science , mathematics , nuclear medicine , medical physics , medicine , surgery , mathematics education , radiation therapy
A comparison of the monitor unit calculations of a commercial 3D computerized treatment planning system (TPS) with “hand” calculations from lookup tables was made for a large number of clinical cases (greater than 13 500 treatment fields). Differences were analyzed by treatment site for prostate, rectum, cranium, and breast. The 3D TPS monitor unit calculation was systematically higher than the “hand” calculation by an amount that depended on the complexity of the treatment geometry. For simple geometries the mean difference was 1% and was as high as 3% for more complicated geometries. The higher value was attributed to an accumulation of differences introduced by multiple factors in the monitor unit calculation. Careful attention to factors such as patient contour could reduce the mean difference. “Hand” calculations were shown to be an accurate and useful tool for verification of TPS monitor unit calculations. PACS number(s): 87.53.‐j, 87.52.‐g

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here