z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Simple quality assurance method of dynamic tumor tracking with the gimbaled linac system using a light field
Author(s) -
Miura Hideharu,
Ozawa Shuichi,
Hayata Masahiro,
Tsuda Shintaro,
Yamada Kiyoshi,
Nagata Yasushi
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6376
Subject(s) - quality assurance , linear particle accelerator , gimbal , tracking (education) , computer science , simple (philosophy) , field (mathematics) , medical physics , quality (philosophy) , optics , physics , mathematics , engineering , beam (structure) , aerospace engineering , operations management , psychology , pedagogy , external quality assessment , philosophy , epistemology , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics
We proposed a simple visual method for evaluating the dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) accuracy of a gimbal mechanism using a light field. A single photon beam was set with a field size of 30 × 30   mm 2at a gantry angle of 90°. The center of a cube phantom was set up at the isocenter of a motion table, and 4D modeling was performed based on the tumor and infrared (IR) marker motion. After 4D modeling, the cube phantom was replaced with a sheet of paper, which was placed perpendicularly, and a light field was projected on the sheet of paper. The light field was recorded using a web camera in a treatment room that was as dark as possible. Calculated images from each image obtained using the camera were summed to compose a total summation image. Sinusoidal motion sequences were produced by moving the phantom with a fixed amplitude of 20 mm and different breathing periods of 2, 4, 6, and 8 s. The light field was projected on the sheet of paper under three conditions: with the moving phantom and DTT based on the motion of the phantom, with the moving phantom and non‐DTT, and with a stationary phantom for comparison. The values of tracking errors using the light field were 1.12 ± 0.72 , 0.31 ± 0.19 , 0.27 ± 0.12 , and 0.15 ± 0.09   mm for breathing periods of 2, 4, 6, and 8 s, respectively. The tracking accuracy showed dependence on the breathing period. We proposed a simple quality assurance (QA) process for the tracking accuracy of a gimbal mechanism system using a light field and web camera. Our method can assess the tracking accuracy using a light field without irradiation and clearly visualize distributions like film dosimetry. PACS number(s): 87.56 Fc, 87.55.Qr

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom