Open AccessA special report of current state of the medical physicist workforce — results of the 2012 ASTRO Comprehensive Workforce Study
Author(s) -
Chen Erli,
Ar Anna,
Sillanpaa Jussi K,
Yu Yan,
Mills Michael D.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5232
Subject(s) - workforce , certification , workload , medical physicist , accreditation , medical education , quality assurance , reimbursement , medicine , medical physics , board certification , quality (philosophy) , psychology , family medicine , computer science , political science , continuing medical education , physics , external quality assessment , pathology , continuing education , health care , quantum mechanics , law , operating system
The medical physics profession is undergoing significant changes. Starting in 2014, candidates registering for certification exams by the American Board of Radiology must have completed a CAMPEP‐accredited residency. This requirement, along with tightened state regulations, uncertainty in future reimbursement, and a stronger emphasis on board certification, have raised questions concerning the state of the medical physics workforce and its ability to adapt to changing requirements. In 2012, ASTRO conducted a workforce study of the comprehensive field of radiation oncology. This article reviews the findings of the medical physics section of the study, including age and gender distribution, educational background, workload, and primary work setting. We also report on job satisfaction, the perceived supply and demand of medical physicists, and the medical physicists' main concerns pertaining to patient safety and quality assurance. PACS number: 87.90